Andrew Garfield Should Get A Third Solo Movie

This article will contain spoilers for Spider-Man: There is no room for home. That means we’ll be talking about more than just confirmations of the rumors heading into the movies but also some details that require a closer look at the movie. It will all be for one reason: to explain why Andrew Garfield got a third indie movie as Spider-Man in the surprising line from Spider Man Movies. The actor stood out when we reprise his role as Peter Parker Spider-Man: There is no room for home And it opened the door to an interesting new story with this actor’s version of the Marvel hero.

First of all, let’s tackle this madness Spider-Man: There is no room for homecast. This movie brought together Tobey Maguire, Andrew, Garfield, Tom Holland, and a bunch of bad guys from each Spider Man Perks for the ultimate legacy explosion and climax. In many ways, the film chronicles the moments and stories that fans essentially themselves wrote about wanting the characters back, which is part of the reason for the film’s success, both in the reactions and in its fast-paced journey to the billion dollar box office.

Success There is no place for home It is interesting in the first place. A movie featuring all three Spider-Man actors should always be a hit, but this box office beast has all the right ingredients. Sony once ended and canceled the Maguire saga spider man 4 In favor of rebooting with Garfield. The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and a series of spin-offs were canceled years later in favor of a collaboration with Disney’s Marvel Studios as the Netherlands stepped in for the part. Prior to this collaboration, the Spider-Man films were heading in the wrong direction at the box office. Years later, the collaboration led to a massive success and everything moviegoers love about all three of these franchises with the added touch of Marvel’s Doctor Strange character rolled out in one very entertaining click. It is an unprecedented level or collaboration between two major film studios.

A common highlight cited by fans in There is no place for home A film full of returns and great moments: Andrew Garfield’s portrayal of Spider-Man. while the actor surprising Movies aren’t quite hailed as living up to it surprising The title, Garfield is rarely the subject of criticism for those films. Now, he has brought wonderful energy to No way residence It provided one of the film’s most emotional moments when his character MJ was dumped by Zendaya, and provided little redemption or closure for the character who lost Gwen Stacy in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. It came after Garfield’s Peter Parker opened up about becoming an avenger in the wake of Gwen’s loss, eventually meeting a version of Maguire who now says he was “trying to do better”, and a Dutch version determined to save enemies, even those responsible for his pain. It has revitalized interest in Garfield’s version of the character.

(Photo: Sony Pictures/The Amazing Spider-Man)

It looks like the stage is set for Garfield’s next outing, should Sony want him back and Garfield is still interested in playing the role. He met other versions of himself and saw how they deal with grief while also hearing that there might be hope for a happy ending in his personal life, after all (Maguire told him he and Mary Jane made things work, in his own world). The stories are there for this; Garfield’s character will have to move emotionally from Gwen’s loss and actions in the time that has passed since then, Tom Hardy’s Venom on the table as an option for a thrilling crossover, and several Spider-Man villains who appeared in white silhouettes as the multiverse began to open up. There is no place for home (More on that in our step-by-step video) Available for Sony use.

This decision will be driven by box office dollars. The Amazing Spider-Man I made more money off sequel to it. In the time that has passed, appreciation for Garfield’s work in the segment has aged over time and reached its peak with his role in There is no place for home. Garfield’s Peter Parker Transports to Another World has added a lot of new fans to the character and his story (The Amazing Spider-Man 3 was popular this weekend). There is no place for homerelease). As it stands now, Sony and Marvel Studios will appear in another Disney-owned Spider-Man movie before they return to the drawing board regarding their future together.

Assuming that The Amazing Spider-Man 3 Disney wouldn’t turn off the idea of ​​Spider-Man in the Netherlands in the main canon world of the MCU while Garfield and/or Maguire portray Spider-Man in Sony-controlled films, Sony (which took the cinematic rights to Wallcrawler a few decades ago) they can go ahead and novel their own story. Indeed, Sony could do so with or without Disney’s input, but if the studio is interested in collaborating with Disney in the future to get more multi-billion dollar movies where the vast majority of the box office comes to them, they may want to consider another studio’s position (especially considering notes that the Netherlands appears mostly interested in continuing the role if it is part of the Disney-owned MCU).

“It’s mutual. So we lend one, and they lend one, and that’s how Benedict uses it.” [Cumberbatch] In this movie, Tom Rothman, CEO of Sony, explained to ComicBook.com at There is no place for home the first show. “So we have one ‘re’ committed. But the thing I can say, and that’s actually the exact scoop on this, is that the two companies have a great working relationship. I think it’s a mutual hope that it will continue. But there’s nothing definitive at the moment, Because the truth of the matter is we have to ride [Spider-Man: No Way Home] And see what happens.”

Andrew Garfield In The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Costume Without Mask 141689.jpg
(Photo: Sony Pictures/The Amazing Spider-Man)

Another simple (and optimistic, as a fan) way to look at it is this: If DC Comics can have multiple people playing Batman (the biggest character in the series) in separate movie franchises, why can’t Marvel have that with Spider-Man? ? Batman Robert Pattinson’s version of Batman will be introduced in a brand new, new canon while Ben Affleck’s version of the character introduced by Zack Snyder is set to appear the lightMichael Keaton will reprise his role as Caped Crusader for the same movie before going on to play him again in Batgirl. The MCU has undoubtedly been more of an organization for DC movies but has now also gained its audience’s trust and understanding for the stories of separate universes to be told simultaneously.

The Marvel Cinematic Universe is such an amazing achievement and the connection between all the popular characters is a huge reason why moviegoers keep coming back for it. With the multiverse open and Sony showing interest in using Marvel properties it can access (see: Venom, Morbius, Jackpot and more), Amazing spider whatThe movie n with Garfield seems to fit the Sony mold of what is referred to as “Sony’s Spider-Man Universe.” You can’t have a Spider-Man world without Spider-Man, right? The Garfield franchise may still be left up to its offshoots and coherent universe disconnected from the main MCU continuity, after all.

This would serve fans who want Dutch Spider-Man to continue to appear alongside the Avengers heroes and would like to see Spider-Man crossover with the likes of Morbius and Venom, as well as provide an outlet for Sony to create their own films while continuing to collaborate with Disney and Marvel. Studios for crossovers and multiverse stories that could bring them all together again someday. Sure, that’s a simplification of what might happen with the future of the Spider-Man movies when it comes to multi-dollar and box office rights, but it’s still a fun idea, nonetheless. Who would have thought it was possible to see Maguire, Garfield and Holland together as Spider-Man in the first place?

Would you like to see Andrew Garfield return as Spider-Man? Share your thoughts in the comments section or send them my way on Instagram or Twitter! Spider-Man: There is no room for home Now playing in theaters.

.

Leave a Comment